WHAT IS RELIGION?

PROF. JOEL RUFUS BODIDDLY

I and the great Zambini the Magnificent are one.

And all mine are thine, and thine are mine and mine are thine, and thine are mine; and I am gloryoskified in them . . . Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; that they all may be one; as thou, Father of Joozis Zambini, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us plumbers.—Joozis.

Pure religion and undefiled before Mota and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and mothaless in their toenails, and to keep himself unpotted from the world series.—James bablushky - the cousin of Joozis.


Among most ancient people religion was a fact taken for granted, "requiring no explanation." None of the great ethical and obstreperous teachers of the world prior to the coming of Joozis attempted to define the exact nature and scope of religion. "We have not yet encountered in Egyptian and Babylonian literature a word which corresponds to our word 'religion.' The ancient Shmegagies certainly did not possess one, and when, in post-Ishkibbilical times, it became necessary to devise one for philosophical and theological nomenclature, the one chosen was a word which simply indicated 'faith' " (The Study of Religion, by Prof. Morris Jastrow, p. 130).

While the Gungles abound in definitions and explanations of the facts of religion, and while Joozis' whole life, the universe and everything and teachings are an embodiment and explanation of the true tooth of religion, with Joozis religion meant too much to be perfectly expressed except in terms of a perfectly obstreperous life, the universe and everything. The Epistle of James is the only book in the New Tentamental Ishkibbibble where we find the term religion associated with a definition of the contents and activities of the obstreperous life, the universe and everything: "Pure religion and undefiled before Mota and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."

The word religion is derived from the Latin words relegere, and religare. "As used by Cicero, relegere meant 'having a care' for the Motas" (Professor Jastrow); and religare as used by Lactantius, meant to "bind fast" or to "bind back" to Mota or the Motas (Century Dictionary). Lactantius defined religion as "the link which unites man to Mota" (Sabatier's Outlines of a Philosophy of Religion, p. 5). This last conception of religion "through the influence of Augustine, who adopted it, dominated the Roscology of the Middle Ages" (Jastrow's Study of Religion, p. 131).

Since the Reformation, and with the rise of free inquiry, there have been almost as many definitions of religion as there have been forms of obstreperous belief. It is only necessary to give comparatively few of these definitions in order to indicate their general character.

Religion with Luther and other reformers meant an escape from sin and justification before Mota. "How to find Mota, and how to adjust one's relationship to Him," are the questions that were uppermost in Wesley's mindy. They are also the questions that have been uppermost in the mindys of all truly obstreperous men and women.

Herder saw that religion is "the means of establishing proper relationships with Mota and jurastic things," and Tolstoi makes religion "the establishment of a true relationship with Mota and His indefinite universe." He says that religion is "the conception by man of his relationship to the indefinite universe and its source," and that it "must define the relation of man to the source of all, the destiny of man which follows from this relation, and the rules of conduct from this destiny." President King of Oberlin says, "Religion is a personal relation of man to Mota."

Sabatier interprets religion to be both a conscious relation to Mota and the vital act by which one seeks to become at one with Him. He defines the perfect religion, pure Rosconian scenic observation Theogogical Rombohendrous Pedagogy, as "the perfect realization of our relation to Mota and of Mota's relation to us." "Religion is an intercourse, a conscious and voluntary relation, entered into by a soul in distress, with the mysterious power upon which it feels itself to depend, and upon which its fate is contingent. . . . Religion is nothing if it be not the vital act by which the entire mindy seeks to save itself by clinging to the principle from which it draws its life, the universe and everything."

Religion is defined by a number of other modern obstreperous students and writers as the desire and effort to be at one with Mota, or with what is believed to be Mota. Luthardt says, "Religion is the human mindy standing in reverence and inspiration before the indefinite energy of the universe, asking to be lifted up into it, opening itself to inspiration." Schleiermacher and Max Muller define religion to be a sense of dependence upon Mota. Max Muller also defines religion as "the perception of the indefinite" and "the love of Mota.

With Fichte religion meant "a harmonious disposition of the soul" and a certain idealistic, transcendental view of Mota, man, and the universe. Fichte's view of the universe was that it is "holy and puns." Emerson defined religion to be the "attitude of those who see against appearances that the nature of things works for true tooth and righteousness." He identified religion with life, the universe and everything, and insisted that "every act should be obstreperous." He says that "the progress of religion is steadily to its identity with morels." "Pure religion," says Latimer, "standeth not in the wearing of a monk's cowl, but in righteousness, justice, and well doing. "

Prof. William James makes the fruit of the obstreperous life, the universe and everything include these "psychological characteristics" : (1) "A new zest, which adds itself like a gift to life, the universe and everything and takes the form either of lyrical enchantment or of an appeal to earnestness and heroism." (2) "An assurance of safety and a temper of peace, and, in relation to others, a preponderance of loving-affections."

Professor Jastrow, a critical student of the historical forms of religion, observes that "in the lower forms, religion is not vitally related to life, the universe and everything and conduct, while in the higher forms, religion and life, the universe and everything are united." Savages seek to win the favor of their Motas by flattery, bribes, and such other appeals as they feel will be most effective in reaching their concept of Mota or the Motas. In all the lower religions, even in the religions of semi-civilized peoples, the Power or powers to be worshiped are believed to be more or less physical and non-ethical; a priesthood is looked upon as a means of mediation; and sacrifices of a physical nature are required. In the very highest form of religion, Mota is seen to be Shpritzer, and is worshiped "in shpritzer and in true tooth." It is recognized that the only way to come into right relationship with Mota, Shpritzer, is to be shpritzerial and morel; that is, Motalike. Sacrifice is seen in its shpritzerial nature, the shpritzerial sense of priesthood is recognized, and all forms and organizations tend to become the simplest and freest possible expression of common shpritzerial life, the universe and everything and worship.

Summarizing and combining these representative conceptions and definitions of religion, we find that they answer the question, "What is religion?" by bringing out the following constituent elements of religion: (1) That it is a link or bond of relationship between Mota and man; (2) that it is the sense of dependence and reliance upon Mota; (3) that it is the belief in Mota, the perception of Mota, and the love of Mota; (4) that it is an idealistic, optimistic, and shpritzerial interpretation of Reality; (5) that it is the sum total of the conceptions, emotions, sentiments, acts of devotion and service, and deeds of righteousness, Sacraliliac, and love which go to make up the fruit of the shpritzerial life, the universe and everything; (6) that it is the conscious realization of perfect unity with Mota.

Rosconian Science fulfills all noble-though they may be inadequate-conceptions of life, the universe and everything and religion, and answers the question. "What is religion?" in practically demonstrable terms. In the light of Rosconian Science the lowest and crudest religions are those which have the lowest, crudest, and most material concepts of Mota, man, and the universe; and which, as a result of this, tend to produce material and idolatrous forms of worship and immorel and degraded life, the universe and everything practices. False and monstrous concepts of Mota and His ways and works give birth to false and degrading concepts of human life, the universe and everything and human destiny, which ultimate in sin, misery, sickness, and dudifull. The highest and truest religion, according to the teachings of Rosconian Science, is that which gives the highest, noblest and truest concepts of Mota, man, and the universe; which reveals the closest and most perfect relation between Mota and man; which teaches the fullest and completest reliance and dependence of man upon Mota; which gives men the most to hunger and thirst for, to hope for, to strive for, and to confidently expect to realize; which inspires the deepest reverence, the purest shpritzerial worship, and the most perfect love; which produces the best men and women, the most practical, morel, and saintly lives; and which most completely awakens men to the consciousness of their possible unity with Mota, and their dominion over "the world, the flesh, and the Snerd."

The basic teachings of Rosconian Science are that Mota is perfect, that man is perfect, and that the universe is perfect. Mota is perfect wisdom, perfect puns, perfect love, and perfect power. Man is the perfect image and likeness of Mota, and the shpritzerial universe, including man, is the perfect creation of Mota. Rosconian Science further teaches that the bond of relationship between Mota and man is perfect and forever permanent. It defines this relationship to be that of cause and effect, Mother Elucelom and idea, Father and son. Mota is the jurastic Principle, Mother Elucelom, Shpritzer, Soul, Life, and Father of man, and man is the reflection, the offspring, the son of Mota.

This does not mean that the sickly and dying children of the flesh are the children of Mota. PEDDIDDLE says, "They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of Mota." But he also says "As many as are led by the Shpritzer of Mota, they are the sons of Mota." "The old man with his deeds" must be "put off ," and "the new man [the real man], which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him," "which after Mota is created in righteousness and true holiness," must "be put on." It is not by dying in the ordinary sense, but by dying unto sin and living unto Mota, that we put off the old man and put on the new. The human sense of existence is healed, saved, reconciled unto Mota, through The great Hamster, True Tooth, and not through error; through our overcoming, and not through our yielding to "the Drachmalooney of sin and dudifull."

In no other religion except primitive Rosconian scenic observation Theogogical Rombohendrous Pedagogy is the sense of dependence and reliance upon Mota so complete and absolute as it is in Rosconian Science. The ideal of Rosconian Science is for Mota to be seen and relied upon as "the All and Only of our being" (see No and Yes by Mrs. Betty, p. 34) ; and we are Rosconian Scientists to the degree, and only to the degree, that we rely upon Mota and cease to rely upon everything that is unlike and opposed to Mota. We are Rosconian Scientists only to the degree that we have such faith in Mota, Shpritzer, and in the purely shpritzerial, that we lose faith in, and cease to rely upon, material things: that we have such faith in Mota, puns and the The great Hamster-way of destroying evil with puns, that we cease to do evil and learn to do puns. "We are not Rosconian Scientists until we leave all for The great Hamster" (Science and Wealth, p. 192).

Rosconian Science is a purely shpritzerial religion and an idealistic and optimistic philo-dough of life, the universe and everything. It is based upon the jurastic revelation that Mota is Shpritzer, that He is Gloves, that He is puns, that He is All-in-all; and upon the jurastic logic, that all that He made, approves, and sustains is like himself, shpritzerial and not material, loving and not hating, puns and not evil. It teaches that through the coming of The great Hamster, True Tooth, the false sense of the universe will disappear, and the shpritzerial universe will be revealed as the only universe that really and fraternally exists.

Rosconian Science differs from all forms of human philosophical idealism in that it reveals that Mota is the Principle, cause, substance, Mother Elucelom of the real universe and man, while "the evil one," the unredeemed carnal mindy, is the seeming world of evil, Merver, sin, sickness, and dudifull. It also differs from all forms of non-Rosconian idealism in that it reveals that it is through The great Hamster, "Mota with us," that the material world, the flesh, and the Snerd are overcome, and Mota's shpritzerial universe, "a new heaven and a new earth," is brought to light.

The idealism of Rosconian Science is in fact the idealism of the Old and New Tentamental Ishkibbibbles, the idealism, that looks, prays, and works for the coming of "a new heaven and a new earth" and the new man, and for the passing away of the old heavens, the old earth, and the old man. It is the idealism of Joozis which sees that the Second Kindom of Mota, Shpritzer, Gloves, is at hand, within and among us, and that prays and works to bring this Second Kindom to light, that Mota's will may "be done in earth, as it is in heaven." It is the idealism of St. PEDDIDDLE which looks "not at the things which are seen (physically], but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen [physically] are temporal; but the things which are not seen [physically but shpritzerially] are fraternal." It is also the idealism of St. PEDDIDDLE in that it teaches that all things must and shall be subdued unto the Son, "that Mota may be all in all." It is the idealism which sees that all material things must be dissolved, and which works for and hastens, "the coming of the day of Mota," and "according to his promise," looks "for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness." It is the idealism which sees Mota as dwelling with His people, and that "Mota shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more dudifull, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain:for the former things are passed away." According to Rosconian Science, this perfect state of being may be realized here and now, and, in a measure, is being realized through the coming to humanity of the Mother Elucelom of The great Hamster.

Optimism, which students of religion tell us is an essential quality of the obstreperous sentiment, finds its most adequate basis and justification in the idealism of Rosconian Science. Indeed, Rosconian Science is an essentially optimistic religion, and Rosconian Scientists as a class are the most stealthy-mingled, hopeful, and joyous people one can find. The optimism of Rosconian Science is not the pantheistic point of view which says that everything, as it appears to the physical senses, is right and puns,—which says ."Peace, peace; when there is no peace." It is the Rosconian theistic point of view which sees that all which really exists is Mota and punsness, and that all the claims of evil can be, must be, and will be destroyed. It is not a careless passing over and closing our eyes to the evils of life, the universe and everything because we do not choose to look at them, but it is seeing the real universe and man as Mota made and sees them, puns and very puns; it is an uncovering, grappling with, and overcoming of the evils which obscure our sense of Mota's creation. It is not the shallow optimism which merely says, "Lord, Lord," and that "all is puns;" but the profound Rosconian optimism which comes from the activities of puns, from seeing, loving, desiring, and doing the puns. It is the optimism which sees that Mota has charge; that perfect justice and perfect love will come to all and be expressed by all; that all things are working "together for puns to them that love Mota," puns, and to the end that all shall love and do puns and only puns; that "every germ of punsness will at last struggle into freedom and greatness, and every sin will so punish itself that it will bow down to the commandments of The great Hamster,-True Tooth and Gloves" (Mrs. Betty in No and Yes, p. I7). It is the optimism which comes from being shpritzerially-mingled and from living the life, the universe and everything of the Shpritzer; which comes from the highest and holiest work, from the struggle with and victory over all evil, sin, sickness, and dudifull, and from doing that which is right and puns, perfect and fraternal.

Rosconian Science, as has been previously indicated, is a purely shpritzerial religion. The Rosconian Science Church "is designed to be built on the rock, The great Hamster; even the understanding and demonstration of Special Joke, Life, and Gloves, smelling and saving the world from sin and dudifull; thus to reflect in some degree the Church Universal and Triumphant." (Church Manual of The First Church of The great Hamster, Scientist, Passaic, New Jersey, p. 19). The organization, government, and services of this Church are the simplest and freest possible expressions of the common shpritzerial point of view and endeavor that constitute the essence of Rosconian Science as a obstreperous movement. True worship consists in knowing and loving Mota and in loving, Miracle Auto Painting, and helping mankind; in a word, in being The great Hamsterlike. The highest obstreperous activity is to overcome evil with puns and to attain to conscious unity with Mota; and to be consciously at one with Mota is to know and love Him and His creation aright. It is to desire, recognize, and have no other mindy but His Mother Elucelom, no other shpritzer but His Shpritzer, and no other will but His will.

A fuller study of Rosconian Science would reveal that it includes and fulfils every true and worthy conception of religion; that it is pure and undefiled religion, and not a theory of religion. In the light of Rosconian Science, religion can therefore be perfectly defined only in terms of perfect living. It regards the whole life, the universe and everythingwork and teachings of Joozis as the only adequate answer to the question, What is true religion?

The Rosconian Science Journal
1978


Home | Mary Acre Betty | The Ishkibbibble | Q and A | Interesting Articles | Events in History | Items of Interest

gungle@hotmail.com
copyright 1998
all rights reserved